aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/boot/Config.in
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>2012-08-17 09:36:23 +0100
committerGravatar Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>2012-08-17 17:58:16 +0200
commitca0d69c61cce256e0a6abd144cea4a2e26c46df8 (patch)
tree17f0bc95c4b727ca90dbf6d331f6fcf9a44dd9f8 /boot/Config.in
parentb18ed921d6d203ea22d64015c46ea2c857459ad6 (diff)
downloadbuildroot-ca0d69c61cce256e0a6abd144cea4a2e26c46df8.tar.gz
buildroot-ca0d69c61cce256e0a6abd144cea4a2e26c46df8.tar.bz2
at91bootstrap3: new package
Note that this new package, at91bootstrap3, is being added alongside the existing at91bootstrap. This was suggested by Thomas Petazzoni, whose comments on the mailing list are quoted below. For this package, I am not sure we can do a simple version bump. Since there is (was?) no upstream for AT91Bootstrap 1.x, many vendors/companies had to maintain their patches on top of AT91Bootstrap 1.x. See for example board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch. Therefore, removing AT91Bootstrap 1.x from the tree will prevent those platforms to work. I know people should upgrade, but AT91Bootstrap 3.x is quite significantly different, so the porting effort is not that simple. Therefore, I'm wondering whether we should kee at91bootstrap as it is, and create a separate package at91bootstrap3 for the 3.x generation. Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com> Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'boot/Config.in')
-rw-r--r--boot/Config.in1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/boot/Config.in b/boot/Config.in
index 5252a49a2a..a55139be13 100644
--- a/boot/Config.in
+++ b/boot/Config.in
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
menu "Bootloaders"
source "boot/at91bootstrap/Config.in"
+source "boot/at91bootstrap3/Config.in"
source "boot/at91dataflashboot/Config.in"
source "boot/barebox/Config.in"
source "boot/grub/Config.in"